“Only if You Really, Really Need It”: Social Rights Consciousness in the Philippines

Niklas Reese

Abstract


This article argues that communitarianism, as the prevalent citizenship paradigm in the Philippines, observable also in modest expectations towards government services among Filipinos and a high emphasis on individual and community action, can be used to explain the lack of political change in the Philippines. In its first part, the article presents data on the sense of citizenship and concepts of social rights and obligations among Filipinos by combining findings from a series of problem-centered interviews with young urban professionals and quantitative data collected within annual surveys by the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) on government, social inequality, and citizenship. The second part of the article attributes these findings to everyday concepts of citizenship as ideal-typical state responsibility theories and modern citizenship paradigms. By including ethnographic data, it discovers significant traits of communitarianism in Philippine everyday life. This section goes on to present how communitarianism (with its inherent character of exclusivity) impedes a democratic culture and moreover, how it is unable to serve as a guiding social philosophy in unifying a large-scale society mainly consisting of citizens who are strangers (ibang tao) to each other. Nevertheless, in conclusion, the article suggests the possibility of deepening and broadening the sense of citizenship in the Philippine society and its respect for the stranger by drawing on elements of Filipino culture.

Keywords


Citizenship; Communitarianism; Philippines; Political Culture; Social Rights

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amna, E. (2010). Active, passive, or stand-by citizens? Latent and manifest political participation. In E. Amna (Ed.), New forms of citizen participation (pp. 191-204). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

Arendt, H. (1949). Es gibt nur ein einziges Menschenrecht. Die Wandlung, (December), 754-770.

Bernardo, A. (2013). Social dominance orientation and attitudes towards the poor: Contrasting lower and higher socioeconomic groups in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 46(1), 39-69.

Berner, E. (1997). Defending a place in the city: Localities and the struggle for urban land in Metro Manila. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.

Berner, E., & Philipps, B. (2004). Selbsthilfe oder unterlassene Hilfeleistung? Die Flucht des Entwicklungsstaats aus der Fürsorgepflicht. PERIPHERIE, 9, 500-514.

Borchgrevink, A. (2014). Clean and green. Knowledge and morality in a Philippine farming community. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1982). Die feinen Unterschiede. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

Bröckling, U. (2007). Das unternehmerische Selbst. Soziologie einer Subjektivierungsform. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

Candid talk, but…. (2012, September 13). Editorial. Philippine Daily Inquirer, 11.

Claussen, B., & Geissler, R. (Eds.). (1996). Die Politisierung des Menschen: Instanzen der politischen Sozialisation. Opladen: Leske+Budrich.

David, R. (2009, September 5). Hopes for modern politics. Philippine Daily Inquirer, 10.

David, R. (2012a, February 29). Gridlock culture. Philippine Daily Inquirer, 12.

David, R. (2012b, April 11). What’s wrong with our politics? Philippine Daily Inquirer, 7.

Diokno, M. (Ed.). (1997). Democracy and citizenship in Filipino Political Culture. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.

Department of Political Science. (2010). Philippine politics: Democratic ideals and realities. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.

Development Research Centre on Citizenship, Participation and Accountability. (2011). Blurring the boundaries. Citizen action across states and societies. Sussex: IDS. Retrieved from http://www.drc-citizenship.org/system/assets/1052734700/original/1052734700-cdrc.2011-blurring.pdf

Elias, N. (1976). Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation, Band 2. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

Enriquez, V. (1992). From colonial to liberation psychology: The Philippine experience. Quezon City: The University of the Philippines Press.

Franco, J. (2011). Bound by law: Filipino rural poor and the search for justice in a plural-legal landscape. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.

Gatdula, J. (2010, March 4). It’s the inequality, stupid! Business World, 9.

Gatdula, J. (2012, November 8). Really no to the Kasambahay Bill, Business World, 8.

Gaventa, J., & Barrett, G. (2010). So what difference does it make? Mapping the outcomes of citizen engagement. IDS Working Paper 347. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.

Harrow, C., & Paloma, J. (2011, June 25). Bring your own chairs, share your textbooks. Sun Star Davao.

International Social Survey Programme. (2008). Role of government IV – ISSP 2006. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA4700 Data file Version 1.0.

International Social Survey Programme. (2012a). Social knequality IV – ISSP 2009. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5400 Data file Version 3.0.0, doi:10.4232/1.11506.

International Social Survey Programme. (2012b). Citizenship – ISSP 2004. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA3950 Data file Version 1.3.0, doi:10.4232/1.11372.

Jones, E., & Gaventa, J. (2002). Concepts of citizenship: A review. Brighton: IDS.

Kabeer, N., & Haq Kabir, Y. (2009). Citizenship narratives in the absence of good governance: Voices of the working poor in Bangladesh. Sussex: IDS.

Kohlberg, L. (1971). From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. New York: Academic Press.

Labor abuses exposed. (2011, May 11). Business World, 2.

Lamnek, S. (2005). Qualitative Sozialforschung. Weinheim: Beltz Verlag.

Matuschek, I., Krähnke, U., Kleemann, F., & Ernst, F. (2011). Links sein: Politische Praxen und Orientierungen in linksaffinen Alltagsmilieus. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Not all sunlight bright in sunshine industry. (2010, November 13). Philippine Daily Inquirer, 4.

Prein, G., Kelle, U., & Kluge, S. (1993). Strategien zur Integration quantitativer und qualitativer Auswertungsverfahren. Sonderforschungsbereich 186 an der Universität Bremen. Retrieved from http://www.sfb186.uni-bremen.de/download/paper19.pdf

Reese, N. (2015). Handa sa laban araw-araw? (Ready to fight every day?) Readiness to political action and sense of entitlement: How strong is citizenship in the Philippines? With a special focus on international call center agents. Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Philosophie im Fachbereich

Südostasienwissenschaften der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn. (PhD dissertation). Bonn: Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Bonn. Retrieved from http://hss.ulb.uni-bonn.

de/2015/3896/3896.htm

Reese, N., & Carreon, J. (2013). No call for action? Why there is no union (yet) in Philippine call centers. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 6(1), 140-159.

Rodriguez, A. (2009). Governing the other: Exploring the discourse of democracy. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.

Romero, J. (2014, June 12). A failing state. The Manila Times, 5.

Santiago, K. (2014, March 19). Ampaw republic. The Manila Times, 6.

Sucgang, E. (2006). Typology and correlates of political participation among Filipinos. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 39(2), 31-65.

Tan, M. (2014a, January 28). Child rights and WCST. Philippine Daily Inquirer, 8.

Tan, M. (2014b, April 3). CCTV God. Philippine Daily Inquirer, 12.

Teodoro, L. (2014, January 23). Government as encumbrance. Business World, 10.

Walzer, M. (1998). Membership. In D. Jacobson (Ed.), The immigration reader. America in a multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 341-364). Oxford: Malden.

Zialcita, F. (1997). Barriers and bridges to a democratic culture. In M. Diokno (Ed.), Democracy and citizenship in Filipino political culture (pp. 39-68). Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.

Zintl, R. (1996). Politisch-ökonomische Rahmenbedingungen und individuelle wirtschaftliche Lage als Determinanten politischen Verhaltens in Deutschland. In B. Claussen & R. Geissler (Eds.), Die Politisierung des Menschen: Instanzen der politischen Sozialisation (pp. 299-307). Opladen: Leske+Budrich.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-2017.1-6

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

This website is part of www.seas.at