Assembling the ‘Field’: Conducting Research in Indonesia’s Emerging Green Economy

Zachary R Anderson

Abstract


New forms of environmental governance, such as the green economy, premise reconfigurations of social relations and rearticulations of scale, which raise myriad questions for field researchers, not least of all, what actually constitutes ‘the field’, and where it is to be found. These questions – practical, methodological, political, and personal – are integral to research itself and can tell us much about the dynamic forms that social organization and emerging governance structures take in practice. This contribution discusses the methodological challenges associated with ‘doing fieldwork’ in the amorphous networks of an emerging environmental governance assemblage – the green economy. Drawing on my fieldwork in East Kalimantan, Indonesia, I argue that by interrogating the positionality of different actors in relation to this assemblage, while remaining critically reflexive about one’s own role in this production, field researchers can capture something of the rich embodied practices through which knowledge is produced and exchanged. Moreover, this relational focus on networks of knowledge, actors, and policy can help us to explore the processes of translation and negotiation that underlie the implementation of new forms of environmental governance.


Keywords


Assemblage; Fieldwork; Green Economy; Indonesia; Methodology

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, B., & McFarlane, C. (2011). Assemblage and geography. Area, 43(2), 124-127.

Anderson, Z. R. (2015). Pragmatism and politics: Translating the green economy in an Indonesian frontier. Forthcoming.

Aspinall, E., & van Klinken, G. (2011). The state and illegality in Indonesia. Leiden: KITLV Press.

Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599.

Katz, C. (1994). Playing the field: questions of fieldwork in geography. The Professional Geographer, 46(1), 67-72.

Li, T. M. (2007). Practices of assemblage and community forest management. Economy and Society, 36(2), 263-293.

Lorimer, J. (2010). Moving image methodologies for more-than-human geographies. Cultural Geographies, 17(2), 237-58.

Marcus, G. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95-117.

Markowitz, L. (2001). Finding the field: Notes on the ethnography of NGOs. Human Organization, 60(1), 40-46.

Mosse, D. (2004). Is good policy unimplementable? Reflections on the ethnography of aid policy and practice. Development and Change 35(4), 639-671.

Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2012). Follow the policy: A distended case approach. Environment and Planning A 44(1), 21.

Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2003). Anthropology of policy: Perspectives on governance and power. London and New York: Routledge.

Swanton, D. (2010). Flesh, metal, road: Tracing the machinic geographies of race. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(3), 447-466.

UNEP. (2011). Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. Retrieved from http://www.unep.org/greeneconomy




DOI: https://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-2016.1-11

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/