The Iron Silk Road and the Iron Fist: Making Sense of the Military Coup D’État in Thailand

Wolfram Schaffar


In May of 2014, the military of Thailand staged a coup and overthrew the democratically elected government of Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra. The political divisions in Thailand, which culminated in the coup, as well as the course of events leading to the coup, are difficult to explain via Thai domestic policy and the power relations between Thailand’s military, corporate, and civil entities. The divisions can be more clearly revealed when interpreted in the context of the large-scale Chinese project “One Belt, One Road”. This ambitious infrastructure project represents an important step in the rise of China to the position of the world’s biggest economic power and – drawing on world-systems theory – to the center of a new long accumulation cycle of the global economy. Against this backdrop, it will be argued that developments in Thailand can be interpreted historically as an example of the upheavals in the periphery of China, the new center. The establishment of an autocratic system is, however, not directly attributable to the influence of China, but results from the interplay of internal factors in Thailand.


Belt-and-Road Initiative; Coup D’État; High-Speed Train; Thailand; World-Systems Theory

Full Text:



Amornrat Mahitthirook. (2014, July 30). High-speed train gets go ahead.The Bangkok Post. Retrieved from

Arrighi, G. (2007). Adam Smith in Beijing. Lineages of the twenty-first century. London: Verso.

Arrighi G., & Silver, B. J. (2011). Das Ende des langen 20. Jahrhunderts. In A. Demirović, J. Dück, F. Becker, &P. Bader (Eds.), VielfachKrise im finanzmarktdominierten Kapitalismus [in Kooperation mit dem WissenschaftlichenBeirat von Attac] (pp. 211-228). Hamburg: VSA.

Baker, C., & Pasuk Phongpaichit (2009). A history of Thailand [2nd ed.]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bangkok Pundit. (2014, January 9). Constitution court judge: High speed rail not necessary for Thailand.Asian Correspondent. Retrieved from

Broich, T. (2017). Do authoritarian regimes receive more Chinese development finance than democraticones? Empirical evidence for Africa. China Economic Review, 46, 180-207.

Bruff, I. (2014). The rise of authoritarian neoliberalism. Rethinking Marxism, 26(1), 113-129.

Chen Xiangming, & Mardeusz, J. (2015, February 25). China and Europe: Reconnecting across a new silkroad. East by Southeast. Retrieved from

Chatrudee Theparat (2017, June 14). S44 to speed up high-speed train. The Bangkok Post. Retrieved from

Delforge, I. (2004). Thailand: From the Kitchen of the World to food sovereignty. Bangkok: Focus on the GlobalSouth. Retrieved from

Demirović, A. (2018). Autoritärer Populismus als neoliberale Krisenbewältigungsstrategie. PROKLAZeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft, 190(48) Nr. 1, 27-42.

Evers, H.-D., Korff, R., & Suparp Pas-Ong. (1987). Trade and state formation: Siam in the early Bangkok period. Modern Asian Studies, 21(4), 751-771.

Eyler, B. (2015, April 24). Who’s afraid of China’s One Belt One Road Initiative? East by Southeast. Retrieved from

Frank, A. G. (1998). ReOrient. Global economy in the Asian age. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Freedom House. (2018). Freedom in the world 2018. Democracy in crisis. Retrieved from

Glassman, J. (2004). Economic “nationalism” in a post-nationalist era. Critical Asian Studies, 36(1), 37-64.

Godehardt, N. (2016). No end of history. A Chinese alternative concept of international order? SWP Research Paper 2016/RP 02, Berlin: SWP. Retrieved from

Godehardt, N. (2014). Chinas »neue« Seidenstraßeninitiative. Regionale Nachbarschaft als Kern der chinesischen Außenpolitik unter Xi Jinping. SWP-Studien 2014/S 09. Berlin: SWP. Retrieved from

Grävingholt, J. (2011). Der Einfluss Chinas, Russlands und Indiens auf die Zukunft der Demokratie im euro-asiatischen Raum. Analysen und Stellungnahmen 3/2011, Bonn: Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik. Retrieved from

Hashim, K. (2016, August 15). One Belt One Road explained. Bangkok Post. Retrieved from

Hewison, K. (2014, September 23). Judicial politicization as political conservatism. Cultural Anthropology. Retrieved from

Isager, L., & Ivarsson, S. (2008). Strengthening the moral fibre of the nation. The King’s Sufficiency Economy as ethno-politics. In S. Ivarsson & L. Isager (Eds.), Saying the unsayable. Monarchy and democracy in Thailand (pp. 223-240). Copenhagen: NIAS.

Jessop, B. (1999). The strategic selectivity of the state: Reflections on a theme of Poulantzas. Journal of the Hellenic Diaspora, 25, 41-77.

Ji Giles Ungpakorn. (2007). A Coup for the rich. Thailand’s political crisis. Bangkok: Workers Democracy Publishing.

Ji Giles Ungpakorn. (2003). A Marxist history of political change in Thailand.In Ji Giles Ungpakorn (ed.), Radicalising Thailand. New political perspectives(pp. 6-40). Bangkok: Institute of Asian Studies, Chulalongkorn University.

Kasian Tejapira. (2016). The irony of democratization and the decline of royal hegemony in Thailand. Southeast Asian Studies, 5(2), 219-237.

Kneuer, M., & Demmelhuber, T. (2016). Gravity centres of authoritarian rule: a conceptual approach. Democratization, 23(5), 775-796.

Krirkkiat Phipatseritham, & Yoshihara K. (1983). Business groups in Thailand. Research Notes and Discussion Paper No. 41. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Lagerkvist, J. (2009). Chinese eyes on Africa: Authoritarian flexibility versus democratic governance. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 27(2), 119-134.

McCargo, D., & Zarakol, A. (2012). Turkey and Thailand: Unlikely twins. Journal of Democracy, 23(3), 71-79.

Montesano, M. J., Pavin Chachavalpongpun, & Aekapol Chongvilaivan. (2012). Bangkok May 2010. ChiangMai: Silkworm Books.

National Statistical Office. (2018). Key Statistical Data. Retrieved from

Pasuk Pongphaichit, & Baker, C. (2004). Thaksin. The business of politics in Thailand. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.

Pinkaew Laungaramsri. (2016). Mass surveillance and the militarization of cyberspace in Post-Coup Thailand. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 9(2), 195-214.

Pinto, A. C. (2014). Fascism, corporatism and the crafting of authoritarian institutions in inter-war European dictatorships. In A. C. Pinto & A. Kallis (Eds.), Rethinking Fascism and Dictatorship in Europe(pp. 87-120). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Pirongrong Ramasoota. (2016). Online social surveillance and cyber-witch hunting in post-2014 coup Thailand. In Chantana Banpasirichote Wungaeo, B. Rehbein, & Surichai Wun'gaeo (Eds.), Globalization and Democracy in Southeast Asia (pp. 269-288). London: Palgrave MacMillan.

Porphant Ouyyanont. (2008). The crown property bureau in Thailand and the crisis of 1997. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 38(1), 166-189.

Pye, O., & Schaffar, W. (2008). The 2006 anti-Thaksin movement in Thailand: An analysis. Journal of ContemporaryAsia 38(1), 38-61.

Reilly, B. (2013). Southeast Asia: In the shadow of China. Journal of Democracy, 24(1), 156-164.

Reynolds, C. J., & Hong, L. (1983). Marxism in Thai historical studies. The Journal of Asian Studies, 43(1), 77-104.

Riggs, F. W. (1966). Thailand. The modernization of a bureaucratic polity. Honolulu: East-West Center Press.

Robinson, W. I. (2011). Giovanni Arrighi: Systemic cycles of accumulation, hegemonic transitions, and the rise of China. New Political Economy, 16(2), 267-280.

Rossi, A., (2012). Turning red rural landscapes Yellow? Sufficiency economy and royal projects in the hills of Nan province, northern Thailand. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 5(2), 275-291.

Schaffar, W. (2018). Alternative development concepts and their political embedding: The case of sufficiency economy in Thailand. Forum for Development Studies.

Schaffar, W. (2016). New social media and politics in Thailand: The emergence of fascist vigilante groupson Facebook. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 9(2), 215-234.

Schaffar, W. (2010). Der Aufstand, der seinen Namen nicht nennt: Die Rothemden in Bangkok. Das Argument289/2010, [Schwerpunktheft: Die Revolte in der Stadt], 806-816.

Schmalz, S. (2011). Eine kurze Geschichte des chinesischen Aufstiegs im kapitalistischen Weltsystem. Kurswechsel 1/2011, 106-116.

Schmalz, S. (2010). Chinas neue Rolle im globalen Kapitalismus. PROKLA Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft,161(40), 483-503.

Somsak Jeamteerasakul. (2016). Ten years later, reaching an impasse. Presentation at the seminar “10 Years of Politico-Social Crisis in Thailand”, Siences Politiques, Paris, 19 September 2016.

Suehiro Akira. (1989). Capital accumulation in Thailand 1855-1985. Tokyo: Center for East Asian Cultural Studies.

Takahashi Toru. (2013, November 19). China hits groove in making mutual deals with Thailand. NikkeiAsia Review. Retrieved from

Tálos, E. (2014). Das austrofaschistische Herrschaftssystem. In E. Tálos & W. Neugebauer (Eds.), Austrofaschismus. Politik - Ökonomie – Kultur (pp. 394-420). Wien: Lit-Verlag.

Terwiel, B. J. (1991). The Bowring Treaty: Imperialism and the Indigenous Perspective. The Journal of the Siam Society, 79(2), 40-47.

Thai Political Prisoners. (2015). Further updated: Lèse majesté war declared. Political Prisoners in Thailand. Retrieved from

Thalheimer, A. (1930). Über den Faschismus. Gegen den Strom. Organ der KPD (Opposition), Berlin.

The White House. (2015, November 16). Fact sheet: Advancing the rebalance to Asia and the Pacific. Retrieved from

The world’s richest royals. (2011, December 5). Forbes Magazin. Retrieved from rom

Veerayooth Kanchoochat, & Hewison, K. (2016). Introduction: Understanding Thailand’s politics. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 46(3), 371-387.

Walker, A. (2012). Thailand’s political peasants. Power in the modern rural economy. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.

Walker, A. (2008). Royal sufficiency and elite misinterpretations of rural livelihoods. In S. Ivarsson & L.Isager (Eds.), Saying the unsayable. Monarchy and democracy in Thailand (pp. 241-265). Copenhagen: NIAS.

Wallerstein, I. (1974-2011). The modern World-System (Vol. I–IV). New York: Academic Press.

Wang Zheng. (2013, February 5). Not rising, but rejuvenating: The “Chinese Dream”. The Diplomat. Retrieved from

Wood, E. M. (2002). The origin of capitalism: A longer view. London: Verso.

Yale, W. (2015, March 27). China’s maritime Silk Road gamble. East by Southeast. Retrieved from

Zhang Yesui. (2015). One belt one road is not a tool of geopolitics. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Peoples’Republic of China. Retrieved from

Zhao Hong. (2016). China’s One Belt One Road: An overview of the debate [Trends in Southeast Asia #06].Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. Retrieved from

Zhao Yanrong. & Zhang Haihou (2015, July 3). Family ties. China Daily Asia. Retrieved from



  • There are currently no refbacks.

License URL: