Accountability for Serious Crimes and National Reconciliation in Timor-Leste: Progress or Wishful Thinking?

Authors

  • Madalena Pampalk University of Vienna

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-3.1-2

Keywords:

Timor-Leste / East Timor, Accountability, Reconciliation, Justice, Human Rights

Abstract

 

 In 1999 – after 24 years of Indonesian occupation – the people of Timor-Leste voted for their independence. However, Timorese anti-independence militias and the Indonesian military reacted with widespread and systematic attacks against the civilian population in the form of murder, rape, torture and deportation. In order to achieve accountability for the human rights atrocities and reconciliation, various mechanisms at the international, national and regional level were established in Timor-Leste and Indonesia. Despite this multi-layered approach, including courts and alternative justice mechanisms such as truth commissions, justice failed to be delivered. Drawing from the achievements and shortcomings of these institutions, this paper explores why many expectations were left unmet and highlights the influence politics had on the functioning of the organisations. Yet, some hope can be drawn from recent developments that justice for the atrocities committed in Timor-Leste will not be denied for good. 

Author Biography

Madalena Pampalk, University of Vienna

Madalena Pampalk is a research assistant and lecturer at the Department of Criminal Law, University of Vienna, Austria. Her research focuses on transitional justice, international criminal law, and human rights.    

Downloads

Published

2010-05-24

How to Cite

Pampalk, M. (2010). Accountability for Serious Crimes and National Reconciliation in Timor-Leste: Progress or Wishful Thinking?. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 3(1), 8–30. https://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-3.1-2

Issue

Section

Current Research on Southeast Asia