Transdisciplinarity ‘Meets’ Power Structures: Challenges and Experiences of a Capacity Building Project on Transdisciplinarity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-0042Keywords:
Collaboration, Knowledge, North-South, Power Structures, TransdisciplinarityAbstract
The aim of the paper is to discuss and to reflect on the experiences and challenges encountered during the North-South capacity building project on transdisciplinarity, KNOTS (Fostering Multi-Lateral Knowledge Networks of Transdisciplinary Studies to Tackle Global Challenges), which was financed by the EU through the Erasmus+ Capacity Building in Higher Education program. Despite the large body of literature on transdisciplinary approaches and projects, not many studies exist that discuss both the political and the power dimensions within transdisciplinary endeavors, especially not from a social science perspective. Based on the experiences, challenges, and progress over the course of the project, I will analyze how power relations influenced and structured KNOTS. I argue that the success of transdisciplinary North-South collaborations depends very much on awareness of power hierarchies, reflexivity, and positionality as well as different understandings of knowledge. Although differences will be highlighted regarding, for example, the aims of transdisciplinarity or the role of different understandings of science and knowledge, the paper does not aim to increase skepticism regarding transdisciplinarity. Instead, the intent of the reflections is to increase awareness of the influences of power structures and relations in transdisciplinarity projects, especially North-South collaboration projects.
References
Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker, & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology / building society (pp. 205-224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Augsburg, T., & Henry, S. (2016). Expanding the scope of transdisciplinarity. Colorado Critical Review, 1(1), 86-113.
Baber, Z. (2003). Provincial universalism: The landscape of knowledge production in an era of globalization. Current Sociology, 51(6), 615-623.
Bärnthaler, R. (2020). Conflict, controversy, comprise, and compression: The pragmatics of transdisciplinary (development) projects. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 13(2), 193-210.
Basile, E., & Baud, I. (2019). Introduction: Reflecting on development studies in the new millennium. In I. Baud, E. Basile, T. Kontinen, & S. von Itten (Eds.), Building development studies for the new millennium (pp. 1-22). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillian.
Bergmann, M., Jahn, T., Knobloch, T., Krohn, W., Pohl, C., & Schramm E. (2012). Methods for transdisciplinary research. A primer for practice. Frankfurt, Germany: Campus Verlag.
Bernstein, J. H. (2015). Transdisciplinarity: A review of its origins, development, and current issues. Journal of Research Practice, 11(1), 1-20.
Bhambra, G. (2007). Sociology and postcolonialism: Another ‘missing’ revolution. Sociology, 41(5), 871-884. Bracken, L. J., Bulkeley, H. A., & Whitman, W. (2015). Transdisciplinary research: Understanding the stakeholder perspective. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(7), 1291-1308.
Brandt, P., Ernst, A., Gralla, F., Luederitz, C., Lang, D. J., Newig, J., & Wehrden, H. von. (2013). A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science. Ecological Economics, 92, 1-15.
Braunhuber, B., Goisauf, T., & Reinisch, J. (2019). The (re)production and transfer of knowledge in the context of the ‘KNOTS Summer School’ in Chiang Mai 2018 – a critical approach. Working Paper No. 8, Department of Development Studies, University of Vienna. Retrieved from https://ie.univie.ac.at/institut/institutspublikationen/iepublications/aktuelle-publikationen/
Brown, V., Harris, J., & Russel, J. (2010). Tackling wicked problems through the transdisciplinary imagination. New York, NY: Francis and Taylor.
Carp, R. (2001). Integrative praxes: Learning from multiple knowledge formations. Issues in Integrative Studies, 19, 71-121.
Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Chayan V. (n.d.). Thai Baan research: An overview. Retrieved from https://www.iucn.org/downloads/thai_baan_research_an_overview_1.pdf
Chhachhi, A., Hutter, I., Damodaran, S., & Baud, I. (2019). Working towards a shared vision on development studies in India and the Netherlands. In I. Baud, E. Basile, T. Kontinen, & S. von Itten (Eds.), Building development studies for the new millennium (pp. 289-313). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillian.
Connell, R., Pearse, R., Collyer, F., Maia, J. M., & Morell, R. (2017). Negotiating with the North: How Southern-tier intellectual workers deal with the global economy of knowledge. The Sociological Review, 66(1), 41-47.
Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (Eds.). (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? New York, NY: Zed Books.
Dannecker, P., & Heis, A. (2020). ‘Transdisciplinarity’: A framework of knowledge production in North-South partnerships? Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 13(2), 165-174.
Darian-Smith, E., & McCarty, P. (2016). Beyond interdisciplinarity: Developing a global transdisciplinary framework. Transscience, 7(2), 1-16.
David, M. (2007). Equity and diversity: Towards a sociology of higher education for the twenty first century? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(5), 675-690.
Djenontin, I. N., & Meadow, A. E. (2018). The art of co-production of knowledge in environmental sciences and management: Lessons from international practice. Environmental Management, 61, 886-903.
Doi, N. M. (2020). Institutional prospects and challenges to transdisciplinary approach in the knowledge production system of Vietnam: Reflections on a North-South partnership project. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 13(2), 229-242.
Du Plessis, H., Sehume, J., & Martin, L. (2013). The concept and application of transdisciplinarity in intellectual discourse and research. Johannesburg, South Africa: Mapungubwe Institute for Strategic Reflection.
Elzinga, A. (2008). Participation. In G. Hirsch Hadorn, H. Hoffmann-Riem, S. Biber-Klemm, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, D. Joye, C. Pohl, . . . & E. Zemp (Eds.), Handbook of transdisciplinary research (pp. 345- 360). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
European Union. (2016). Erasmus+ Capacity Building in Higher Education: EU Support to Higher Education Institutions Around the World (No. 2014-3663/004). Retrieved from https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/sites/eacea-ite/files/capacitybuildinginhighereducation_b5_web.pdf
Felt, U., Igelsböck, J., Schikowitz, A., & Völker, T. (2015). Sustainability research in practice: Between imaginaries of collective experimentation and entrenched academic value orders. Department of Science and Technology Studies, University of Vienna. Retrieved from http://sts.univie.ac.at/publications
Girvan, N. (2007). Power imbalances and development knowledge. Paper prepared for the project Southern Perspectives on Reform of the International Development Architecture, the North-South Institute, Ottawa.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599.
Harding, S. (2005). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity”?. In A. Cudd & S. Andreasen (Eds.), Feminist theory: A philosophical anthology (pp. 218-236). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Heis, A., & Chayan, V. (2020). Thai Baan methodology and transdisciplinarity as collaborative research practices. Common ground and divergent directions. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 13(2), 211-228.
Hirsch Hadorn, G., Bradley, D., Pohl, C., Rist, S., & Wiesmann, U. (2006). Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecological Economics, 60(1), 119-128.
Ison, R. (2008). Methodological challenges of trans-disciplinary research: Some systemic reflections. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 16(3), 241-251.
Johnston, R. R. (2008). On connection and community: Transdisciplinarity and the arts. In B. Nicolescu (Ed.), Transdisciplinarity: Theory and practice (pp. 223-236). New York, NY: Hampton Press.
Klein, J. T. (2013). The transdisciplinary moment(um). Integral Review, 9(2), 189-197.
Klein, J. T. (2004). Prospects for transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36(4), 515-526.
Kockelmans, J. J. (1979). Why interdisciplinarity? In J. J. Kockelmans (Ed.), Interdisciplinarity and higher education (pp. 123-160). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University.
Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., . . . & Thomas, C. (2012). TD research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainable Science, 7, 25-43.
Langthaler, M., Witjes, N., & Slezak, G. (2012). A critical reflection on knowledge hierarchies, language and development. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 6(4), 235-247.
Leavy, P. (2011). Essentials of transdisciplinary research: Using problem-centered methodologies. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Marginson, S., & Wende, M. van der. (2007). To rank or to be ranked: The impact of global rankings in higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3/4), 306-329.
McGregor, S. (2017). Challenges of transdisciplinray collaboration: A conceptual literature review. Integral Leadership Review, 4(22), 1-15.
Messing, J., Adelman, M., & Durfee, A. (2012). Gender violence and transdisciplinarity. Violence Against Women, 18(6), 641-652.
Mobjörk, M. (2010). Consulting versus participatory transdisciplinarity: A refined classification of transdisciplinary research. Futures, 42, 866-873.
Myint, T. (2016). Citizen science in a democracy: The case of Thai Baan research. Paper prepared for the Tocqueville Lecture Series at the Vincent and Elinor Ostrom Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, 9 September 2016. Retrieved from https://ostromworkshop.indiana.edu/pdf/seriespapers/2016F_Tocq/Myint%20paper.pdf
Nicolescu, B. (2002). Manifesto of transdisciplinarity. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
Novy, A. (2012). ‘Unequal diversity’ as knowledge alliances: An encounter of Paulo Freire’s dialogue approach and transdisciplinarity. Multicultural Education and Technology Journal, 6(3), 137-148.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P. B., & Gibbons, M. T. (2001). Re-thinking science, knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Padmanabhan, M. (Ed.). (2018). Transdisciplinary research and sustainability. Collaboration, innovation and transformation. London, UK: Routledge.
Pohl, C. (2011). What is progress in transdisciplinary research? Futures, 43(6), 618-626.
Pohl, C., & Hirsch Hadorn, G. (2008). Core terms in transdisciplinary research. In G. Hirsch Hadorn, H. Hoffmann-Riem, S. Biber-Klemm, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, D. Joye, C. Pohl, . . . & E. Zemp (Eds.), Handbook of transdisciplinary research (pp. 427-432). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
Pohl, C., Krütli, P., & Stauffacher, M. (2017). Ten reflective steps for rendering research socially relevant. GAIA, 26(1), 42-51.
Polk, M. (2015). Transdisciplinary co-production: Designing and testing a transdisciplinary research framework for societal problem solving. Futures, 65, 110-122.
Qi, J. (2015). Knowledge hierarchies in transnational education: Staging dissensus. London, UK: Routledge.
Rose, G. (1997). Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21(3), 305-320.
Rosendahl, J., Zanella, M. A., Rist, S., & Weigelt, J. (2015). Scientists’ situated knowledge: Strong objectivity in transdisciplinarity. Futures, 65, 17-27.
Schmidt, L., Domptail, S., Klintenberg, P., Gruber, M., Schmiedel, U., Zimmermann, I., & Falk, T. (2013). Transdisciplinary research and stakeholder involvement: A review of the TFO approach. Biodiversity & Ecology, 5, 195-212.
Schmidt, L., & Neuburger, M. (2017). Trapped between privileges and precariousness: Tracing transdisciplinary research in a postcolonial setting. Futures, 93, 54-67.
Schmidt, L., & Pröpper, M. (2017) Transdisciplinarity as a real-world challenge: A case study on a North- South collaboration. Sustainability Science, 12(3), 365-379.
Seemann, F., & Antweiler, C. (2020). Linking European and Southeast Asian transdisciplinary knowledge production: Lessons learnt by doing evaluation. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 13(2), 243-259.
Semmler, L. (2019). Dissemination and communication of the transdisciplinary project “KNOTS”. Working Paper No. 7. Department of Development Studies, University of Vienna. Retrieved from https://ie.univie.ac.at/Institut/institutspublikationen/aktuelle_publikationen/
Studley, J. (1998). Dominant knowledge systems and local knowledge. Community-Based mountain tourism: Practices for linking conservation with enterprise. Paper presented at the Electronic Conference of the Mountain Forum. Retrieved from http://thunderbolt.me.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/Dominant+Knowledge+Systems+and+Local+Knowledge.pdf
Turino, T., & Lea, J. (2004). Identity and the arts in diaspora communities. Warren, MI: Harmonie Park Press.
Vilsmaier, U., Engbers, M., Luthardt, P., Maas-Deipenbrock, R. M., Wunderlich, S., & Scholz, R. W. (2015). Case-based mutual learning sessions: Knowledge integration and transfer in transdisciplinary processes. Sustainable Science, 10(4), 563-580.
Vilsmaier, U., Faschingeder, G., & Mercón, J. (2020, in press). Methods for inter- and transdisciplinary research and learning based on Paulo Freire. Journal of Development Studies, 37(2/3).
Wickson, F., Carew, A. L., & Russell, A. W. (2006). Transdisciplinary research: Characteristics, quandaries, and quality. Futures, 38(9), 1046-1059.
Wiesmann, U., Hirsch Hadorn, G., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher, W., Joye, D., & Zemp, E. (2008). Enhancing transdisciplinary research: A synthesis in fifteen propositions. In G. Hirsch Hadorn, H. Hoffmann-Riem, S. Biber-Klemm, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, D. Joye, C. Pohl, . . . & E. Zemp (Eds.), Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research (pp. 433-441). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Society for South-East Asian Studies (SEAS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
For all articles published in ASEAS before December 2014 and after July 2022, copyright is retained by the authors. For articles published between January 2015 and June 2022, the Society for South-East Asian Studies (SEAS) is the copyright holder. Articles published in ASEAS before December 2019 are licensed under the following Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported. Articles published after that date are licensed under the following Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International. In both cases, this means that everybody is free to share (to copy, to distribute, and to transmit the work) under the following conditions:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
