Multiform Transmission and Belonging: Buddhist Social Spaces of Thai Migrant Women in Belgium
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-0079Keywords:
Belgium, Buddhist Social Space, Multiform Transmission, Thai Buddhist Temples, Thai Migrant WomenAbstract
The Thai migration to Belgium is numerically a woman-led phenomenon, which has captured social attention for the last decades. This attention entails stereotypes about Thai migrant women as ‘workers’ in the intimate industry and/or ‘exotic wives’ of Belgian men. To challenge these stereotypes, the present paper explores the often-ignored dimension of Thai women’s sociality. Specifically, it examines the transmission dynamics occurring in their Buddhist social spaces, which shape and reinforce their sense of belonging. To do so, it draws from ethnographic fieldwork with Thai migrant women and key social actors within the Thai population in the country. Data analysis unveils that these women engage in multiform modes of transmission in their Buddhist social spaces. First, they transmit good deeds from the material world to the spiritual realm through merit-making practices and by seeking spiritual guidance in the temple. Second, they pass their socio-cultural ways of belonging to their children by engaging in different socializing activities. And third, they involve themselves in sharing religious faith, material symbols, and tastes described as part of Thai culture. Through this multiform transmission, Thai migrant women confront in subtle ways the common-held views about them at the intersection of their various identities as spouses, mothers, citizens, and Buddhist devotees.
References
Ambrosini, M., Bonizzoni, P., & Molli, S. D. (2021). How religion shapes immigrants’ integration: The case of Christian migrant churches in Italy. Current Sociology, 69(6), 823-842.
Bailey, A. (2017). The migrant suitcase: Food, belonging and commensality among Indian migrants in The Netherlands. Appetite, 110, 51-60.
Basch, L., Schiller, N. G., & Blanc-Szanton, C. (1994). Nations unbound. Transnational projects, postcolonial predicaments, and deterritorialized nation-states. Gordon and Breach.
Bastenier, A., & Dassetto, F. (1985). Organisations musulmanes de Belgique et insertion sociale des populations immigrées. Revue européenne des Migrations internationales, 1(1), 9-23.
Baumann, M. (1995). Creating a European path to nirvana: Historical and contemporary developments of Buddhism in Europe. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 10(1), 55-70.
Bava, S., & Capone, S. (2010). Religions transnationales et migrations: Regards croisés sur un champ en mouvement. Autrepart, 56(4), 3-15.
Bonifacio, G. T., & Angeles, V. S. (Eds.). (2010). Gender, religion, and migration: Pathways of integration. Rowman & Littlefield.
Bottero, W. (2014). Class identities and the identity of class. Sociology, 38(5), 985-1003.
Bourdieu, P. (1997). The forms of capital. In A. H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, & A. S. Wells (Eds.), Education. Culture, economy, society (pp. 46-58). Oxford University Press.
Butratana, K., & Trupp, A. (2011). Thai communities in Vienna. ASEAS - Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 4(1), 183-190.
Butratana, K., & Trupp, A. (2021). Gender, class, and paradoxical mobilities of Thai marriage migrants in Austria. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 42(1), 85-106.
Chuenglertsiri, P. (2020). Transnationalism, family life, and wellbeing: Opportunities and challenges for Thai marriage migrants in the UK. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Sussex.
Cohen, E. (1991). Christianity and Buddhism in Thailand: The “battle of the axes” and the “contest of power”. Social Compass, 38(2), 115-140.
Cole, J. (2014). Producing value among Malagasy marriage migrants in France: Managing horizons of expectation. Current Anthropology, 55(S9), S85-S94.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139-167.
De Backer, B. (2002). Bouddhismes en Belgique. Courrier hebdomadaire du CRISP, 23, 5-70.
Faist, T. (1998). Transnational social spaces out of international migration: Evolution, significance and future prospects. European Journal of Sociology/Archives européennes de sociologie, 39(2), 213-247.
Fathi, M. (2017). Intersectionality, class and migration. Narratives of Iranian women migrants in the UK. Springer.
Fornaro, A. (2019). In search of transgenerational footprints: The transgenerational script questionnaire. Transactional Analysis Journal, 49(4), 308-323.
Fresnoza-Flot, A. (2010). The Catholic Church in the lives of irregular migrant Filipinas in France: Identity formation, empowerment and social control. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 11(3-4), 345-361.
Fresnoza-Flot, A. (2019). Othering mechanisms and multiple positionings: Children of Thai-Belgian couples as viewed in Thailand and Belgium. Civilisations, 68, 139-161.
Fresnoza-Flot, A. (2021). Relational transnationalism of Filipino/Thai-Belgian youths in Belgium: Mothers, memories, emotions, and social entities. In K. Geoffrion, J. Le Gall & C. Therrien (Eds.), Mixed families in a transnational world (pp. 29-47). Routledge.
Fresnoza‐Flot, A. (2022). Intersecting categories in the dissolution of transnational marriages: A socio‐legal perspective. Population, Space and Place, 28(5), e2462.
Grothe‐Hammer, M., & la Cour, A. (2020). Organization and membership: Introduction to the Special Issue. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 37(3), 419-424.
Hall, S. (1997). Introduction: Who needs ‘identity’? In S. Hall & P. du Gay (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 1-17). Sage.
Hélie-Lucas, M. A. (2001). What is your tribe? Women’s struggles and the construction of Muslimness. Dossier, 23/24, 49-63.
Heyse, P. (2010). Deconstructing fixed identities: An intersectional analysis of Russian-speaking female marriage migrants’ self-representations. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 31(1), 65-80.
Jackson, P. (2020). Beyond hybridity and syncretism. Journal of Anthropology, 3(1), 1-37.
Kitiarsa, P. (2005). Beyond syncretism: Hybridization of popular religion in contemporary Thailand. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 36(3), 461-487.
Knott, E. (2017). Nationalism and belonging: Introduction. Nations and Nationalism, 23(2), 220-226.
Knott, K. (2005). The location of religion. A spatial analysis. Equinox.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Blackwell.
Lévy, F. (2022). Migrate to divorce, to overcome divorce, or to avoid divorce? Divorce and migration nexus among Chinese (wo)men migrants in Paris. Population, Space and Place, 28, e2582
Levitt, P. (2003). “You know, Abraham was really the first immigrant”: Religion and transnational migration. International Migration Review, 37(3), 847-873.
Levitt, P. (2004). Redefining the boundaries of belonging: The institutional character of transnational religious life. Sociology of Religion, 65(1), 1-18.
Levitt, P., & Schiller, N. G. (2004). Conceptualizing simultaneity: A transnational social field perspective on society. International Migration Review, 38(3), 1002-1039.
Liebelt, C. (2010). Becoming pilgrims in the Holy Land: On Filipina domestic workers’ struggles and pilgrimages for a cause in Israel. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 11(3-4), 245-267.
Light, I., Sabagh, G., Bozorgmehr, M., & Der-Martirosian, C. (1992). Los Angeles: L’économie ethnique iranienne. Revue européenne des Migrations internationales, 8(1), 155-169.
Light, I., Sabagh, G., Bozorgmehr, M., & Der-Martirosian, C. (1993). Internal ethnicity in the ethnic economy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 16(4), 581-597.
Lippmann, W. (1922). Stereotypes. In Public opinion (pp. 79-94). MacMillan Co.
Luangthongkum, T. (2007). The positions of non-Thai languages in Thailand. In H. Guan Lee & L.
Suryadinata (Eds.), Language, nation and development in Southeast Asia (pp. 181-194). ISEAS Publishing.
Maliepaard, M., & Lubbers, M. (2013). Parental religious transmission after migration: The case of Dutch Muslims. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(3), 425-442.
Mascia, C., & Odasso, L. (2015). Le contrôle du mariage binational en Belgique: Les règles du jeu. Revue de l’Institut de Sociologie, 85, 41-68.
Maskens, M. (2015). Bordering intimacy: the fight against marriages of convenience in Brussels. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 33(2), 42-58.
May, V. (2011). Self, belonging and social change. Sociology, 45(3), 363-378.
McAlister, E. (2002). Rara! Vodou, power, and performance in Haiti and its diaspora. University of California Press.
McAuliffe, C. (2016). Unsettling the Iranian diaspora: Nation, religion and the conditions of exile. In H. B. Foundation in co-operation with Transparency for Iran (Ed.), Identity and exile. The Iranian diaspora between solidarity and difference, (Heinrich Böll Foundation Publication Series on Democracy, vol. 40, pp. 32-46). Heinrich Böll Foundation.
Naidu, M. (2012). ‘Mind the gap’: The structural ecology of small networked communities. AlterNation, 19(1), 280-305.
Pande, A. (2017). Mobile masculinities: Migrant Bangladeshi men in South Africa. Gender & Society, 31(3), 383-406.
Pieterse, J. N. (2003). Social capital and migration: Beyond ethnic economies. Ethnicities, 3(1), 29-58.
Piper, N., & Roces, M. (Eds.). (2004). Wife or worker?: Asian women and migration. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Plank, K. (2015). The sacred foodscapes of Thai Buddhist temples in Sweden. Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis, 26, 201-224.
Scott, J. W. (1986). Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. The American Historical Review, 91(5), 1053-1075.
Sénécal, G. (2012). Community development and social actor theories: A case study in Montréal (Canada). Social Geography, 7(1), 37-46.
Serve the City. (2010). [ : en] My name is Tracy, I am for sale [ : fr] Mon nom est Tracy, je suis à vendre. ServetheCity.be. http://www.servethecity.be/brussels/2010/06/my-name-is-tracy-iam-for-sale
Shields, J. (2010). Sexuality, exoticism, and iconoclasm in the media age: The strange case of the Buddha bikini. Faculty Contributions to Books, 96, https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/fac_books/96
Skrbiš, Z. (2007). From migrants to pilgrim tourists: Diasporic imagining and visits to Medjugorje. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(2), 313-329.
Socorro Flores Tondo, J. (2010). Popular religiosity and the transnational journey: Inscribing Filipino identity in the Santo Niño Fiesta in New Zealand. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 11(3-4), 219-244.
Statbel. (2022). Population par commune selon la nationalité et le sexe depuis 1992. Statbel (Office belge de statistique). https://statbel.fgov.be/sites/default/files/files/documents/bevolking/5.1%20Structuur%20van%20de%20bevolking/popstranger-1992-fr.xlsx
Tao, A.-h., & Chen, X. (2017). A review of the theoretical models of stereotypes. International Journal of Research Studies in Science, Engineering and Technology, 4(9), 22-26.
Treps, M. (2000). Transmettre: un point de vue sémantique. Ethnologie française, 30(3), 361-367.
van Hear, N. (2014). Reconsidering migration and class. International Migration Review, 48(1), S100–S121.
Webster, N. A. (2016). Gender and social practices in migration. A case study of Thai women in rural Sweden. PhD dissertation, Department of Human Geography, Stockholm University.
Webster, N. A., & Caretta, M.A. (2016). “Women in groups can help each and learn from each other?”: The role of homosocial practices within women’s social networks in building local gender. Multidisciplinary Journal of Gender Studies, 5(3), 1072-1097.
Welty, R. (2009). The Thai and I: Thai culture and Thai society. Asia Books.
Werbner, P., & Johnson, M. (Eds.). (2019). Diasporic journeys, ritual, and normativity among Asian migrant women. Routledge.
Xiu, N. (2015). European-Asian cross-referencing landscape. A case study in Sweden. In D. Bruns, O. Kühne, A. Schönwald, & S. Theile (Eds.), Landscape culture-culturing landscapes. The differentiated construction of landscapes (pp. 199-206). Springer VS.
Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Belonging and the politics of belonging. Patterns of Prejudice, 40(3), 197-214.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Asuncion Fresnoza-Flot
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
For all articles published in ASEAS before December 2014 and after July 2022, copyright is retained by the authors. For articles published between January 2015 and June 2022, the Society for South-East Asian Studies (SEAS) is the copyright holder. Articles published in ASEAS before December 2019 are licensed under the following Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported. Articles published after that date are licensed under the following Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International. In both cases, this means that everybody is free to share (to copy, to distribute, and to transmit the work) under the following conditions:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
