Thai Immigrant Service-based Entrepreneurship in the UK: Mixed Embeddedness, Superdiversity, and Combined Ethnic and Non-Ethnic Capital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-0078Keywords:
Forms of Capital, Immigrant Entrepreneurship, Mixed Embeddedness, Service-Based Entrepreneurship, Thai MigrantsAbstract
This paper examines Thai immigrant entrepreneurship in the UK, drawing on 17 inter-views with Thai migrants in Brighton, East Sussex. It explores how Thai immigrants from different socioeconomic backgrounds and migration pathways mobilize ethnic and non-ethnic forms of capital in their entrepreneurial activities. Thai immigrants constitute a relatively new, small, but internally diverse migrant population in the UK, with female marriage migrants dominating the Thai migrant population in the past two decades. The findings of this study reveal that Thai migrants tend to own small-scale businesses or provide personal services in three sectors: cleaning and care work, beauty and massage, and food and catering. In their interaction with opportunity structures in the UK, Thai restaurant and massage entrepreneurs mobilize the exotic notion of “Thai-ness” to add value to their services catering to local British customers.
References
Angeles, L. C., & Sunanta, S. (2009). Demanding daughter duty: Gender, community, village transforma-tion and transnational marriages in Northeast Thailand. Critical Asian Studies, 41(1), 549-574.
Barberis, E., & Solano, G. (2018). Mixed embeddedness and migrant entrepreneurship: Hints on past and future direction. Sociologica,12(2), 1-22.
Barrett, G., Jones, T., & McEvoy, D. (2003). United Kingdom: Severely constrained entrepreneurialism. In R. Kloosterman & J. Rath (Eds.), Immigrant entrepreneurship: Venturing abroad in the age of globalisation(pp. 101-122). Berg Publishers.
Becoming an anti-racist city: Our diversity. (2022). https://www.brighton-hove.gov.uk/becoming-anti-racist-city/our-diverse-city
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richard (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). Greenwood Press.
Brighton and Hove City Council. (n.d.) Brighton & Hove city snapshot: Summary of statistics 2014. http://www.bhconnected.org.uk/sites/bhconnected/files/City%20Snapshot%20Summary%20of%20Statistics%202014.pdf
Butratana, K., & Trupp, A. (2021). Gender, class and paradoxical mobilities of Thai marriage migrants in Austria. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geographies, 42(1), 85-106.
Chuenglertsiri, P. (2020). Transnationalism, family life, and wellbeing: Opportunities and challenges for Thai marriage migrants in the UK. PhD dissertation, University of Sussex.
Dabic, M., Vlacic, B., Paul, J., Dana, L., Sahasranamam, S., & Glinka, B. (2020). Immigrant entrepreneurship: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 113, 25-38.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage.
Ehrenreich, B., & Hochschild, A. R. (2004). Global woman: Nannies, maids, and sex workers in the new economy. Henry Holt.
Flap, H., Kumcu, M., & Bulder, B. (2000). The social capital of ethnic entrepreneurs and their business suc-cess. In J. Rath (Ed.), Immigrant businesses: The economic, political and social environment (pp. 142-161). Palgrave Macmillan.
Fresnoza-Flot, A., & Pécoud, A. (2007). Emergence of entrepreneurship among Filipino migrants in France. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 16(1), 1-28.
Hochschild, A. R. (2003). The commercialization of intimate life: Notes from home and work. University of California Press.
Janjuha-Jivraj, S. (2003). The sustainability of social capital within ethnic networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1), 31-43.
Jones, T., Ram, M., Edwards, P., Kiselinchev, A., & Muchenje, L. (2014). Mixed embeddedness and new migrant enterprise in the UK. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 26(5-6), 500-520.
Kitcharoen, P. (2007). An ethnography of restaurant workers: Thai women in England. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 16(4), 555-577.
Klag, M., & Langley, A. (2013). Approaching the conceptual leap in qualitative research. International Journal of Management Reviews,15(2), 149-166.
Kloosterman, R. C. (2010). Matching opportunities with resources: A framework for analysing (migrant) entrepreneurship from a mixed-embeddedness perspective. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22(1), 25-45.
Kloosterman, R. C., & Rath, J. (2001). Immigrant entrepreneurs in advanced economies: Mixed embeddedness further explored. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 27(2), 189-201.
Kloosterman, R. C., Rusinovic, K., & Yeboah, D. (2016). Super-diverse migrants – similar trajectories? Ghanian entrepreneurship in the Netherlands seen from a mixed embeddedness perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies,42(6), 913-932.
Lancee, B. (2010). The economic returns of immigrants’ bonding and bridging social capital: The case of the Netherlands. International Migration Review, 44(1), 202-226.
Lapanun P. (2019). Love, money and obligation: Transnational marriage in a Northeastern Thai village. NUS Press.
Nederveen Pieterse, J. (2003). Social capital and migration: Beyond ethnic economies. Ethnicities, 3(1), 29-58.
Nee, V., & Sanders, J. (2001). Understanding the diversity of immigrant incorporation: forms-of-capital model. Ethnic and Racial Studies,24(3), 386-411.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
Ram, M., Jones, T., Edwards, P., Kiselinchev, A., Muchenje, L., & Woldesenbet, K. (2011). Engaging with superdiversity: New migrant businesses and the research-policy nexus. International Small Business Journal,31(4), 334-356.
Ram, M., Smallbone, D., Deakins, D., & Jones, T. (2003). Banking on ‘break-out’: Finance and the develop-ment of ethnic minority businesses. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies,29(4), 633-681.
Ram, M., Theodorakopoulos, N., & Jones, T. (2008). Forms of capital, mixed embeddedness and Somali enterprise. Work, Employment & Society, 22(3), 427-446.
Ruenkaew P. (2009). Female transnational migration from Thailand like thirty years before? Pacific News, 32, 22-24.
Selcuk, G., & Suwala, L. (2020). Migrant family entrepreneurship: Mixed and multiple embeddedness of transnational Turkish family entrepreneurs in Berlin. Journal of Family Business Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-03-2019-0011
Sepulveda, L., Syrett, S., & Lyon, F. (2011). Population superdiversity and new migrant enterprise: The case of London. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 23(7-8), 469-497.
Sims, J. M. (2008). Empowering individuals and creating communities: Thai perspectives on life in Britain. The Runnymede Trust. https://assets.website-files.com/61488f992b58e687f1108c7c/617be10b55f22d7378db979e_EmpoweringIndividualsCreatingCommunity-2008.pdf
Sinsuwan, W. (2018). Thai marriage migrants in Germany and their employment dilemma after the Residence Act of 2005. PhD Dissertation, Humboldt University.
Solano, G., Schutjens, V., & Rath, J. (2022). Multifocality and opportunity structure: towards a mixed embeddedness model for transnational migrant entrepreneurship. Comparative Migration Studies, 10(1), 1-24.
Statham, P., Scuzzarello, S., Sunanta, S., & Trupp, A. (2020). Globalising Thailand through gendered ‘both-ways’ migration pathway with ‘the West’: Cross-border connections between people, states, and places. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(8), 1513-1542.
Sunanta, S. (2013). Gendered nation and classed modernity: The perceptions of mia farang (foreigners’ wives) in Thai society. In T. Bunnell, D. Parthasarathy, & E. Thompson (Eds.), Cleavage, connection and conflict in rural, urban and contemporary Asia (pp. 183-199). Springer.
Sunanta, S. (2020). Globalising the Thai ‘high-touch’ industry: Exports of care and body work and gendered mobilities to and from Thailand. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(8), 1543-1561.
Sunanta, S. & Angeles, N. C. (2013). From rural life to transnational wife: agrarian transition, gendered mobility and intimate globalization in transnational marriages in Northeast Thailand. Gender, Place and Culture,20(6), 699-717.
Supatkul, P. (2020). Intraethnic othering among Thai wives of white American men: An intersectional approach. Journal of Mekong Society, 16(3), 24-43.
Trupp, A. (2015). Agency, social capital and mixed embeddedness among Akha ethnic minority street vendors in Thailand’s tourist areas. Sojourn, 30(3), 780-818.
UK still popular among uni students. (2021). https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/2071703/uk-still-popular-among-uni-students
Vershinina, N., Barett, R., & Meyer, M. (2011). Forms of capital, intra-ethnic variation, and Polish entrepre-neurs in Leicester. Work, Employment and Society, 25(1), 101-117.
Vershinina, N., Rodgers, P., McAdam, M., & Clinton, E. (2019). Transnational migrant entrepreneurship, gender and family business. Global Networks,19(2), 238-260.
Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024-1054.
Wahlbeck, Ö. (2018). Combining mixed embeddedness and transnationalism: the utilization of social resources among Turkish migrant entrepreneurs. Sociologica,12(2), 73-86.
Webster, N., & Haandrikman, K. (2017). Thai women entrepreneurs in Sweden: Critical perspectives on migrant small businesses. Women’s Studies International Forum, 60, 17-27.
Yamamura, S., & Lassalle, P. (2020). Approximating entrepreneurial superdiversity: Reconceptualizing the superdiversity debate in ethnic minority entrepreneurship. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies,46(11), 2218-2239.
Yamamura, S., & Lassalle, P. (2022). Extending mixed embeddedness to a multi-dimensional concept of transnational entrepreneurship. Comparative Migration Studies. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-022-00288-y
You, T., & Zhou, M. (2019). Simultaneous embeddedness in immigrant entrepreneurship: Global forces behind Chinese-owned nail salons in New York City. American Behavioral Scientist,63(2), 166-185.
You, T., & Zhou, M. (2021). Gender and transnational dynamics in immigrant entrepreneurship: A case study of Chinese-owned nail salons in New York City. Journal of Chinese Overseas,17, 239-264
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Sirijit Sunanta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
For all articles published in ASEAS before December 2014 and after July 2022, copyright is retained by the authors. For articles published between January 2015 and June 2022, the Society for South-East Asian Studies (SEAS) is the copyright holder. Articles published in ASEAS before December 2019 are licensed under the following Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported. Articles published after that date are licensed under the following Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International. In both cases, this means that everybody is free to share (to copy, to distribute, and to transmit the work) under the following conditions:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
