Digital Intimacies and the Construction of Social Capital in a Heteronormative Society: A Study of Dating App Users in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-0104Keywords:
Dating Apps, Digital Intimacies, Heteronormativity, Homosexual User, Social CapitalAbstract
Dating apps are digital platforms that mediate meaningful relationships and facilitate digital intimacies. This study examines the construction of social capital by dating app users in Indonesia. Using Pierre Bourdieu’s and Robert D. Putnam’s concepts of social capital as well as the virtual ethnography method, this study focuses on how heterosexual and homosexual users of dating apps in heteronormative Indonesia manage to build digital intimacies and accumulate social capital. This study shows that dating app users in Indonesia assemble social capital through networked individualism and automated connectivity. The results demonstrate that dating app users exploit digital intimacies as resources to expand their networks, which enables them to gain certain benefits. Additionally, homosexual users build digital intimacies to gain a sense of acceptance and belonging in digital space. They show more efforts towards being inclusive and active in accumulating and exchanging social capital than their heterosexual counterparts.
References
Andhika, S. C. (2022, 24 February) Aplikasi kencan online kian populer saat pandemi, waspada jebakan cinta palsu [Online dating apps are gaining popularity during the pandemic, beware of fake love traps].
DW. https://www.dw.com/id/waspada-romance-scam-di-aplikasi-kencan/a-60889914
Anthias, F. (2007). Ethnic ties: Social capital and the question of mobilisability. The Sociological Review, 55(4), 788-805.
Asti. (2021, 20 August). 5 aplikasi dating online paling diminati di Indonesia [5 most popular online dating apps in Indonesia]. Daily Social. http://dailysocial.id/post/5-aplikasi-dating-online-paling-diminati-diindonesia
Attwood, F., Hakim, J., & Winch, A. (2017). Mediated intimacies: Bodies, technologies, and relationships. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(3), 249-253.
Banerjee, D. & Rao, T. S. S. (2021). “#Intimacy” at times of COVID-19: The renewed impetus behind cybersex. Journal of Psychosexual Health, 3(1), 13-17.
Baym, N. K. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age. Wiley.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). Greenwood.
Chambers, D. (2006). New social ties: Contemporary connections in a fragmented society. Palgrave Macmillan.
Chambers, D. (2013). Social media and personal relationships: Online intimacies and networked friendship. Palgrave Macmillan.
Dina, S. (2018). Aplikasi kencan LGBT terus muncul, ini kata Menkominfo [LGBT dating apps continue to appear, this is what the Minister of Communication and Information said]. (22 January 2018). Kominfo.
Dobson, A. S., Carah, N., & Robards, B. (2018). Digital intimate publics and social media: Towards theorizing public lives on private platforms. In A. S. Dobson, N. Carah, & B. Robards (Eds.), Digital intimate publics and social media (pp. 3-28). Palgrave Macmillan.
Espineira, K. (2016). Transgender and transsexual people’s sexuality in the media. Parallax, 22(3), 323-329.
Fatayati, S. (2014). Konsep waria dalam televisi Indonesia: Sebuah kajian dekonstruktif [The concept of Waria in Indonesian TV: A deconstructive study]. Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman, 25(2), 360-381.
Greenhalgh, H. (2021, 1 September). Banned and blocked: LGBT+ websites censored from Russia to Indonesia. The Jakarta Post. https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2021/09/01/banned-and-blockedlgbt-
websites-censored-from-russia-to-indonesia.html
Hestianingsih. (2022, 25 April). Heboh Tinder dimanfaatkan bukan untuk cari jodoh, tapi promosi asuransi [Fuss Tinder is used not to find a mate, but to promote insurance]. Detik. https://wolipop.detik.com/love/d-6049889/heboh-tinder-dimanfaatkan-bukan-untuk-cari-jodoh-tapi-promosi-asuransi
Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. Sage.
Kim, E., & Yoon, S. (2021). Social capital, user motivation, and collaborative consumption of online platform services. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 62, 102651.
Lambert, A. (2016). Intimacy and social capital on Facebook: Beyond the psychological perspective. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2559-2575.
Lengauer, D. (2016). New media in Southeast Asia: Concepts and research implications. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 9(2), 187-194.
Listiorini, D., & Davies, S. G. (2017, 18 April). Online dating apps blocked. Inside Indonesia. https://www.insideindonesia.org/online-dating-apps-blocked
Mahdi, M. I. (2022, 28 January). Berapa pengeluaran pengguna Indonesia untuk aplikasi kencan? [How much do Indonesian users spend on dating apps?]. Data Indonesia. https://dataindonesia.id/internet/detail/berapa-pengeluaran-pengguna-indonesia-untuk-aplikasi-kencan
McGlotten, S. (2013). Virtual intimacies: Media, affect, and queer sociality. SUNY Press.
Noviani, R. (2009). Performativitas gender dalam iklan kontak jodoh [Gender performativity in matchmaking ads]. In I. Abdullah, W. Udasmoro, & Hasse (Eds.), Dinamika masyarakat dan kebudayaan kontemporer [Dynamics of contemporary society and culture] (pp. 45-76). TICI Publications & Pustaka Pelajar.
Portes, A. (2000). The two meanings of social capital. Sociological Forum, 15(1), 1-12.
Putnam, R. D. (2020). Bowling alone revised and updated the collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster Ebook.
Ragnedda, M. (2018). Conceptualizing digital capital. Telematics and Informatics, 35(8), 2366-2375.
Rizaty, M. A. (2022, 8 February). Pelanggan aplikasi kencan daring Tinder meningkat 17,07% pada kuartal II 2021 [The subscribers of Tinder online dating app increase by 17.07% in the second quarter of 2021]. Katadata. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/02/08/pelanggan-aplikasi-kencandaring-tinder-meningkat-1707-pada-kuartal-ii-2021
Rui, J. R., Covert, J. M., Stefanone, M. A., & Mukherjee, T. (2015). A communication multiplexity approach to social capital: On- and offline communication and self-esteem. Social Science Computer Review, 33(4), 498-518.
Shumway, D. (2003). Modern love: Romance, intimacy and the marriage crisis. New York University Press.
Sicaya, K. V. A., Budhiarta, I N. P., & Widiati, I. A. P. (2022). Perlindungan hukum terhadap waria dari perlakuan diskriminatif [Legal protection toward transgender from discriminatory treatments]. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 4(3), 288-292.
Solomon, F. (2016, 16 September). Indonesia wants to ban Grindr and dozens of other gay-networking apps. Time. https://time.com/4496531/indonesia-lgbt-grinder/
Sunanta, S. (2022). Thai immigrant service-based entrepreneurship in the UK: Mixed embeddedness, superdiversity, and combined ethnic and non-ethnic capital. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 15(2), 213-230.
Swandari, S. (2011) Jodoh online, mengapa tidak? [Online soul mate, why not?]. (15 September 2011).
Kompas. http://regional.kompas.com/read/2011/09/15/05283434/jodoh.online.mengapa.tidak
Thorpe, H., Jeffrey, A., Fullagar, S., & Ahmad, N. (2023). “We seek those moments of togetherness”: Digital intimacies, virtual touch and becoming community in pandemic times. Feminist Media Studies, 23(7), 3419-3436.
Trupp, A. (2015). Agency, social capital, and mixed embeddedness among Akha ethnic minority street vendors in Thailand’s tourist areas. SOJOURN: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 30(3), 780-818.
Usman, M. (2023). Zakat distribution for handling transgender in Indonesia: A perspective of maslahah mursalah. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam, 7(1), 357-376.
van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.
Vargo, D., Zhu, L., Benwell, B., & Yan, Z. (2021). Digital technology use during COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(1), 13-24.
Vartabedian, J. (2019). Bodies and desires on the internet: An approach to trans women sex workers’ websites. Sexualities, 22(1-2), 224-243.
Wellman, B. (2001). Physical place and cyber place: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(2), 227-252.
Wijaya, H. Y. (2021) Merasai Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick untuk melampaui politik identitas [Feeling Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick to transcend identity politics]. In R. D. Larasati & R. Noviani (Eds.), Melintas perbedaan: Suara perempuan, agensi, dan politik solidaritas [Crossing differences: Women’s voices,
agencies, and the politics of solidarity] (pp. 157-190). Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.
Wittel, A. (2001). Toward a network sociality. Theory, Culture & Society, 18(6), 51-76.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ratna Noviani, Rinta Arina Manasikana, Debora Dayu Ajeng Anggrahita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
For all articles published in ASEAS before December 2014 and after July 2022, copyright is retained by the authors. For articles published between January 2015 and June 2022, the Society for South-East Asian Studies (SEAS) is the copyright holder. Articles published in ASEAS before December 2019 are licensed under the following Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported. Articles published after that date are licensed under the following Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International. In both cases, this means that everybody is free to share (to copy, to distribute, and to transmit the work) under the following conditions:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
