Sacred Ground, Contested Space: Deathscapes in the Aftermath of an Environmental Disaster in East Java, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-0135Keywords:
Anthropology of Value, Cultural Identity, Deathscape, Lapindo Mudflow, Socio-spatial JusticeAbstract
This study explores the sociocultural, economic, and symbolic significance of graveyards – conceptualized as deathscapes – among survivors of the Lapindo mudflow disaster in Sidoarjo, East Java. Drawing on ethnographic engagement and qualitative interviews, the research reveals how graveyards serve not only as burial sites but also as spaces of memory, resistance, and identity. Survivors attach multifaceted values to these spaces: functional (as burial grounds), economic (as assets negotiated through purchasing power), and symbolic (as sites of cultural resilience and protest). In some cases, deathscapes can transform into enduring symbols of resistance against displacement and contested compensation policies. By applying David Graeber’s anthropological theory of value, the study demonstrates that space is never singular in meaning but constantly redefined through socio-political and cultural practices. These findings contribute to urban political ecology and the anthropology of value by highlighting how disaster survivors negotiate socio-spatial justice through the preservation and reinterpretation of sacred spaces.
References
Armitage, D., & Tam, C.-L. (2007). A political ecology of sustainable livelihoods in coastal Sulawesi, In-donesia. Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue Canadienne d’études Du Développement, 28(1), 39–57.
Basworo, G. P. (2019). Pemetaan lahan potensial perumahan di kota Surakarta berdasarkan pendekatan analisis. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan, 5(2), 244–256.
Christ, M. (2022). Regulating urban death in early modern German towns. Mortality, 27(2), 206–221.
Davies, P. J., & Bennett, G. (2016). Planning, provision and perpetuity of deathscapes—Past and future trends and the impact for city planners. Land Use Policy, 55, 98–107.
Davies, R. J., Brumm, M., Manga, M., Rubiandini, R., Swarbrick, R. E., & Tingay, M. (2008). The East Java mud volcano (2006 to present): An earthquake or drilling trigger? Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 272(3–4), 627–638.
Davies, R. J., Mathias, S., Swarbrick, R. E., & Tingay, M. (2011). Probabilistic longevity estimate for the LUSI mud volcano, East Java. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 168, 517–523.
Davies, R. J., Swarbrick, R. E., Evans, R. J., & Huuse, M. (2007). Birth of a mud volcano: East Java, 29 May 2006. GSA Today, 17(2), 4–9.
Drake, P. (2017). Indonesia and the politics of disaster: Power and representation in Indonesia’s mud vol-cano. Routledge.
Firman, T. (2000). Rural to urban land conversion in Indonesia during boom and bust periods. Land Use Policy, 17(1), 13–20.
Firman, T., Kombaitan, B., & Pradono, P. (2007). The dynamics of Indonesia’s urbanisation, 1980–2006. Urban Policy and Research, 25(4), 433–454.
Foucault, M. (2008). Of other spaces (1967) (L. De Cauter & M. Dehaene, Trans.). In M. Dehaene & L. De Cauter (Eds.), Heterotopia and the City: Public Space in a Postcivil Society (pp. 13–29). Routledge.
Graeber, D. (2001). Toward an anthropological theory of value. Palgrave Macmillan.
Graeber, D. (2013). It is value that brings universes into being. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3(2), 219–243.
Hamdi, M. (2015). Efek Lapindo: Transformasi lanskap, relasi sosio-spasial dan komensurasi milai di era pasar [Master Thesis]. Universitas Indonesia.
Hein, J. I. (2019). Political ecology of REDD+ in Indonesia: Agrarian conflicts and forest carbon. Routledge.
Heng, T. (2022). Interacting with the dead: Understanding the role and agency of spirits in assembling deathscapes. Social & Cultural Geography, 23(3), 400–423.
Ho, P., & Zhao, H. (2024). Empty institutions, cemeteries, and conflict: An institutional study of China’s struggle for burial ground. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2024.2421870
Husain, S. B. (2010). Negara di tengah kota: Politik representasi dan simbolisme perkotaan (Surabaya 1930-1960). Penerbit BRIN. https://doi.org/10.55981/brin.473
Kuswardono, P. T., Mudita, I. W., & Pandie, D. B. W. (2021). The landlords, the peasant, and the reten-tion basin: Local political ecology of water management in the small island of Semau, Kupang, In-donesia. International Journal of Tropical Drylands, 5(1), 12–19.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Blackwell.
Maddrell, A., & Sidaway, J. D. (2016). Introduction: Bringing a spatial lens to death, dying, mourning and remembrance. In A. Maddrell & J. D. Sidaway (Eds.), Deathscapes: Spaces for death, dying, mourn-ing and remembrance (pp. 1–16). Routledge.
Mardiansjah, F. H., Rahayu, P., & Rukmana, D. (2021). New patterns of urbanization in Indonesia: Emer-gence of non-statutory towns and new extended urban regions. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 12(1), 11–26.
Mazzini, A., Svensen, H., Akhmanov, G. G., Aloisi, G., Planke, S., Malthe-Sørenssen, A., & Istadi, B. (2007). Triggering and dynamic evolution of the LUSI mud volcano, Indonesia. Earth and Planetary Sci-ence Letters, 261(3–4), 375–388.
McMichael, H. (2009). The Lapindo mudflow disaster: Environmental, infrastructure and economic im-pact. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 45(1), 73–83.
Muryono, S., Bimasena, A. N., & Dewi, A. R. (2019). Optimalisasi pemanfaatan neraca penatagunaan tanah dalam penyusunan Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan, 4(2), 224–248.
Nalle, V. I. W., & Moeliono, T. P. (2023). Spatial injustice in the context of cemeteries: The case of Sura-baya, Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 131, 106751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106751
Neilson, J. (2016). Indonesia: A political–economic history of environment and resources. In P. Hirsch (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of the Environment in Southeast Asia (pp. 374–389). Routledge.
Nora, P. (1989). Between memory and history: Les lieux de mémoire. Representations, 26, 7–24.
Novenanto, A. (Ed.). (2013). Membingkai Lapindo: Pendekatan konstruksi sosial atas kasus Lapindo: sebuah bunga rampai. MediaLink & Kanisius.
Novenanto, A. (2016). Membangun bencana: Tinjauan kritis atas peran negara dalam kasus Lapindo. Masyarakat: Jurnal Sosiologi, 20(2), 159–192.
Novenanto, A. (2018). Manusia dan tanah: Kehilangan dan kompensasi dalam kasus Lapindo. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan, 1(1), 1–11.
Novenanto, A. (2019a). Dampak sosial-ekonomi pemindahan paksa: Studi atas penyintas lumpur Lap-indo, Jawa Timur. Jurnal Masyarakat & Budaya, 21(3), 293–316.
Novenanto, A. (2019b). Kota sebagai ruang terbuka: Belajar dari Waduk Sepat, Surabaya. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan, 5(2), 180–194.
Novenanto, A., & Suyadnya, I. W. (2025). Muddied Memories as Vernacular Heritage of an Unnatural Disaster. In M. Herzfeld & R. Padawangi (Eds.), Resilience as Heritage in Asia (pp. 177–199). Am-sterdam University Press.
Oliver-Smith, A. (2011). Defying displacement: Grassroots resistance and the critique of development. Uni-versity of Texas Press.
Parsaulian, A. P., & Sudjito. (2019). Masalah tumpang tindih sertipikat hak milik atas tanah di kota Ban-jarbaru (Putusan nomor: 24/G/2014/PTUN.BJM). BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan, 5(1), 129–135.
Peters, R. (2016). Death and the control of life in an Indonesian city. Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 172(2–3), 310–342.
Petersson, A. (2016). The production of a memorial place: Materialising expressions of grief. In A. Mad-drell & J. D. Sidaway (Eds.), Deathscapes: Spaces for death, dying, mourning and remembrance (pp. 141–159). Routledge.
Pujianingsih, V., & Setiawan, B. (2021). CEPACS dan penyesuaian lahan sebagai mekanisme land value capture pembangunan Aerotropolis Yogyakarta International Airport. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan, 7(1), 1–13.
Rothberg, M. (2009). Multidirectional memory: Remembering the Holocaust in the age of decolonization. Stanford University Press.
Rugg, J. (2022). Social justice and cemetery systems. Death Studies, 46(4), 861–874.
Rusu, M. S. (2020). The privatization of death: The emergence of private cemeteries in Romania’s postsocialist deathscape. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 20(4), 571–591.
Schiller, J., Lucas, A., & Sulistiyanto, P. (2008). Learning from the East Java mudflow: Disaster politics in Indonesia. Indonesia, 85, 51–77.
Schmid, C. (2022). Henri Lefebvre and the theory of the production of space (M. K. Zachary, Trans.). Verso.
Sudibyanung, S., Dewi, A. R., & Wulansari, H. (2018). Pola keruangan nilai tanah di kota Madiun menggunakan perspektif ekonomi. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan, 3(2), 201–216.
Sukaryanto, S. (2016). Konflik tanah surat ijo di Surabaya (Sebuah perspektif teoretik-resolutif). BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan, 2(2), 165–178.
Zuber, H. M. M. (2009). Titanic made by Lapindo (B. Batubara & S. Masykur, Trans.). Lafadl Pustaka.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anton Novenanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
For all articles published in ASEAS before December 2014 and after July 2022, copyright is retained by the authors. For articles published between January 2015 and June 2022, the Society for South-East Asian Studies (SEAS) is the copyright holder. Articles published in ASEAS before December 2019 are licensed under the following Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported. Articles published after that date are licensed under the following Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International. In both cases, this means that everybody is free to share (to copy, to distribute, and to transmit the work) under the following conditions:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
