Customary-State Authority Contestation in Forest Governance: Mechanisms, Sustainability, and Local Community Welfare in Aceh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-0139Keywords:
Aceh, customary authority, forest governance, legal pluralism, political ecologyAbstract
Forests are central to ecological sustainability and local livelihoods, yet forest governance in Aceh is characterized by persistent contestation between customary institutions, such as Imuem Mukim, Geuchik/Reje, and the Aceh/Gayo Customary Councils on the one hand and state authorities on the other, despite legal formal recognition of customary rights through Constitutional Court Decision No. 35/2012 and the Aceh Governance Law No. 11/2006. This study examines how customary–state authority contestation is produced and negotiated through concrete governance mechanisms rather than overt conflict. Drawing on political ecology, legal pluralism and governance theories, this qualitative case study employs interviews, participant observation, focus group discussions, and document analysis in selected sites in Aceh. The findings suggest that contestation operates primarily through technical and procedural mechanism, including spatial mapping and zoning, permit regimes, documentary requirements, and social forestry programs. While customary authorities govern forests through socially embedded norms emphasizing moral obligation and collective stewardship, state actors exercise authority through bureaucratic instruments privileging legality, documentation, and development-oriented rationalities. These interactions generate an asymmetrical configuration of authority, in which customary institutions persist through negotiated and conditional incorporation. The study contributes to global debates on political ecology and legal pluralism by showing that forest sustainability and local community welfare depend on how institutional pluralism is managed in practice through negotiated co-governance arrangements.
References
Afiff, S. A., & Rachman N. F. (2019). Institutional activism: Seeking customary forest rights recognition from within the Indonesian state. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 20(5), 453–470.
Agrawal, A. (2008). The role of local institutions in adaptation to climate change. World Bank.
Agrawal, A., & Ribot, J. C. (1999). Accountability in decentralization: A framework with South Asian and West African cases. The Journal of Developing Areas, 33, 473–502.
Andriyadi, F. (2015). Reposisi Majelis Adat Aceh dalam tata pemerintahan Aceh pasca Qanun No. 10 ta-hun 2008. IN RIGHT: Jurnal Agama dan Hak Azazi Manusia, 5(1), 125–152.
Apresian, S. R. (2025). The contestation of national adaptation policies in Indonesia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 44(1), 72–101.
Apriana, E. (2015). Adat Aceh dalam praktek konservasi lingkungan. Jurnal Serambi Akademica, 3(2), 166–173.
Asriadi, A., Sara, R., & Zudan, Z. A. (2023). Juridical analysis of settlement of land disputes through deci-sions of customary institutions. Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management, 2(10), 2363–2370.
Asteria, D., Alvernia, P., Kholila, N. B., Husein, S. I., & Asrofani, F. W. (2024). Forest conservation by the indigenous Baduy community in the form of customary law. Journal of Cultural Heritage Man-agement and Sustainable Development, 14(2),175–189.
Astuti, R., & McGregor, A. (2015). Responding to the Green Economy: How REDD+ and the One Map Initi-ative are transforming forest governance in Indonesia. Third World Quarterly, 36(12), 2273–2293.
Aswita, D., Samuda, S., Apriana, E., & Herlina H. (2022). Rethinking the roles and institutions of Pawang Uteun for sustainable forest management: Literature review. Proceedings of International Confer-ence on Multidisciplinary Research, pp. 58–65. Universitas Serambi Mekkah.
Aziz, T. C. M. (2012, October). The existence of Pawang Glee and Peutuwa Seuneubok of Mukim Pintoe Batee’s indigenous community, Peudada in Bireuen regency, Aceh. Paper presented at the 4th In-ternational Graduate Students Conference on Indonesia. The Graduate School of Gadjah Mada Uni-versity, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Budi, S., Hamid, A. H., Fajri, F., & Agussabti, A. (2019). The role of customary institutions for agricultural communities and agricultural extension. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 22(2), 443-450.
Butarbutar, F. P. (2023). The determinants of environmental quality in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Applied Economics, 11(1), 27–39.
Butt, S. (2014). Traditional land rights before the Indonesian Constitutional Court. Law, Environment and Development Journal, 10(1), 57–75.
Camacho, L. D., Combalicer, M. S., Yeo-Chang, Y., Combalicer, E. A., Carandang, A. P., Camacho, S. C., de Luna, C. C., & Rebugio, L. L. (2012). Traditional forest conservation knowledge/Technologies in the Cor-dillera, Northern Philippines. Forest Policy and Economics, 22, 3–8.
Colfer, C. J. P., Prabhu, R., & A. M. Larson, A. M., (2021). Adaptive collaborative management in forest landscapes. Routledge.
Colona, F., & Jaffe R. (2016). Hybrid governance arrangements. The European Journal of Development Research, 28(2), 175–183.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five ap-proaches. SAGE Publications.
Deliana, E., Rauf, M.A., & Akmal, Z. (2023). How indigenous peoples resolve Ulayat land disputes (Study in Koto Gasib, Siak Regency). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Paper pre-sented at 3rd Riau Annual Meeting on Law and Social Sciences (RAMLAS): The Role of Law, Envi-ronmental Science and Policy for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (RAMLAS-2022) 1181:012008
Dressler, W. H., Wilson, D., Clendenning, J., Cramb, R., Keenan, R., Mahanty, S., Bruun, T. B., Mertz, O., & Las-co, R. D. (2017). The impact of swidden decline on livelihoods and ecosystem services in Southeast Asia: A review of the evidence from 1990 to 2015. Ambio: A Journal of Environment and Society, 46(3), 291–310.
Firman, T. (2009). Decentralization reform and local-government proliferation in Indonesia: Towards a fragmentation of regional development. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 21(2/3), 143–157.
Fisher, M. R., Dhiaulhaq, A., & Sahide, M. A. K. (2019). The politics, economies, and ecologies of Indonesia’s third generation of social forestry: An introduction to the special section. Forest and Society, 3(1), 152-170.
Fisher, M. R., & van der Muur, W. (2020). Misleading icons of communal lands in Indonesia: Implications of Adat forest recognition from a model site in Kajang, Sulawesi. The Asia Pacific Journal of An-thropology, 21(1), 55–76.
Forsyth, T. (2018). Is resilience to climate change socially inclusive? Investigating theories of change processes in Myanmar. World Development, 111, 13–26.
Hall, D., Hirsch, P., & Li, T. M. (Eds.). (2013). Powers of exclusion: Land dilemmas in Southeast Asia. Na-tional University of Singapore Press and University of Hawaii Press.
Harley, J. B. (1989). Deconstructing the map. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 26(2), 1–20.
Harly, L. N. B. (2023). Sustainable forest management from the perspective of customary law in Indone-sia: A case study in the Bayan community. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), 32–42.
Hasnitaria, Moulia, N., & Fazzan (2022). Kewenangan Pawang Glee terhadap penyelesaian sengketa antarwarga dalam pemanfaatan hutan di Aceh berdasarkan prinsip utilitarianisme. Journal of So-cial and Policy Issues, 2(2), 105–107.
Hidayat, H., Yogaswara, H., Herawati, T., Blazey, P., Wyatt, S., & Howitt, R. (2018). Forests, law and cus-tomary rights in Indonesia: Implications of a decision of the Indonesian constitutional Court in 2012. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 59(3), 293–308.
Huberman, M., & Miles, M. B. (2002). The Qualitative Researcher’s Companion. SAGE Publications.
Kurniawan. (2012). Eksistensi masyarakat hukum Adat dan lembaga-lembaga Adat di Aceh dalam penye-lenggaraan keistimewaan dan Otonomi Khusus di Aceh. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 1(3), 48-66.
Larson, A. M., & C. Ribot, J. C. (2007). The poverty of forestry policy: Double standards on an uneven playing field. Sustainability Science, 2(2), 189–204.
Latif, I. R., Hajad, V., Handayani, S. W.; Sudarman, & Aziz, C. I. (2024). Sustainable forests, divided power: Navigating the complexities of customary forest resource of management in Aceh Jaya. Journal of Governance and Social Policy, 5(1), 46–62.
Lund, C. (2017). Rule and rupture: State formation through the production of property and citizenship. In C. Lund & M. Eilenberg (Eds.), Rule and rupture (pp. 1-29). Wiley Blackwell.
Madiong, B., Almusawwir, Renggong, R., Oner, B., Abdurrifai, Y., Makkawaru, Z., Tira, A., & Juliati. (2023). Dynamics of tenure conflict in Ammatoa Kajang customary forest area, Bulukumba regency. Rus-sian Law Journal, 11(3), 688-699.
Mahmuddin, & Januar, E. (2020). Konstelasi negara dan kelembagaan Adat dalam pengelolaan hutan adat di Aceh. Research Report, Department of Public Administration, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry.
Mansur, T. M., Adli, M., Sulaiman, M., & Yahya, A. (2024). The division of Mukim and Gampong traditional areas in customary forest management in Aceh province, Indonesia. Jurnal Geuthèë: Penelitian Multidisiplin, 7(1), 49-57.
Mardhiah, N., Tjoetra, A., Marefanda, N., Saputra, J., & Muhammad, Z. (2023). The role of traditional insti-tution (Keujreun Blang) in realizing the agricultural industrialization in Nagan Raya, Aceh Prov-ince, Indonesia. Journal of Madani Society, 2(2), 75–86.
Mardhiah, N., Marefanda, N., Jonsa, A., & Afriandi, F. (2024). Socialization on the urgency of establishing the Keujruen Blang customary institution towards an inclusive farmer community. Bubungan Tinggi: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 6(2), 389-397.
Mulyoutami, Rismawan, R., and Joshi, L. (2009). Local knowledge and management of Simpukng (Forest Gardens) among the Dayak people in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Forest Ecology and Management, 257(10), 2054–2061.
Mursyidin, Saputra, A., Baihaqi, Saputra, J., & Siregar, W. M. (2023). The crisis of the agency for customary institutions (Keujruen Blang): From the New Order, reformation to peace of Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 11(1), 363- 378.
Muslihin, Maryani, E., & Yani, A. (2022). Pawang Uteun local wisdom values in managing Aceh forest. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1089(1), 012050.
Myers, R., Intarini, D., Sirait, M. T., & Maryudi, A. (2017). Claiming the forest: Inclusions and exclusions under Indonesia’s ‘new’ forest policies on customary forests. Land Use Policy, 66, 205–213.
Nasution, Pangeran, P. P. A. (2017). ‘Wase Glee’: Dari kearifan hingga kenaifan lokal para peramu hasil hutan di Aceh. UMBARA: Indonesian Journal of Anthropology, 2(1), 24-33.
van Oosten, C., Gunarso, P., Koesoetjahjo, I., & Wiersum, F. (2014). Governing forest landscape restoration: Cases from Indonesia. Forests, 5(6),1143–1162.
Peluso, N. L. (1995). Whose woods are these? Counter‐mapping forest territories in Kalimantan, Indone-sia. Antipode, 27(4), 383–406.
Peluso, N. L., & Vandergeest, P. (2020). Writing political forests. Antipode, 52(4), 1083–1103.
Pichler, M., & Ingalls, M. (2021). Negotiating between forest conversion, industrial tree plantations and multifunctional landscapes. Power and politics in forest transitions. Geoforum, 124, 185–194.
Ramadhan, M. S. (2024). Peranan Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan dalam penanganan ka-sus pidana lingkungan hidup dan kehutanan. Indonesian Journal of Law Studies, 3(2), 98-112
Ribot, J. C., & Peluso, N. L. (2003). A theory of access*. Rural Sociology, 68(2), 153–181.
Robbins, P. (2020). Political ecology: A critical introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.
Safitri, M. A. (2015). Dividing the land: Legal gaps in the recognition of customary land in Indonesian for-est areas. Kasarinlan: Philippine Journal of Third World Studies, 30(2), 31-48.
Schleicher, J., Schaafsma, M., & Vira, B. (2018). Will the Sustainable Development Goals address the links between poverty and the natural environment? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 34, 43–47.
Scott, J. C. (1976). The moral economy of the peasant: Rebellion and subsistence in Southeast Asia. Yale University Press.
Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.
Siscawati, M. (2014). Pertarungan penguasaan hutan dan perjuangan perempuan Adat. Wacana: Jurnal Transformasi Sosial, 33, 159–197.
Sopaheluwakan, W. R. I., Fatem, S. M., Kutanegara, P.M., & Maryudi, A. (2023). Two-decade decentraliza-tion and recognition of customary forest rights: Cases from special autonomy policy in West Pa-pua, Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 151, 102951.
Sufriadi, Y., Ratna, L., & Syarifudin. (2024). The violence in conflict of natural resources tenure rights-companies vs traditional communities in Indonesia. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 15(1), 197–220.
Suganda, D. (2024). Living laws in forest guarding in Aceh portrait of experiences past and today. Legiti-masi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Politik Hukum, 13(1), 47-67.
Syahputri, N. V., Mardhiah, N., Marefanda, N., & Macella, A. D. R. (2023). Communication pattern between regional government and local government in establishing traditional institution. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 6 (11), 7188-7192.
Tamma, S., & Duile, T. (2020). Indigeneity and the state in Indonesia: The local turn in the dialectic of recognition. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 39(2), 270–289.
Vakkuri, J., & Johanson. J. E. (Eds.). (2021). Hybrid governance, organisations and society: Value creation perspectives. Routledge.
Williams, D. A. (2023). The politics of deforestation and REDD+ in Indonesia. Routledge.
Wollenberg, E. K., Nawir, A. A., Uluk, A., & Pramono, H. (2001). Income is not enough: The effect of eco-nomic incentives on forest product conservation: A comparison of forest communities dependent on the agroforests of Krui, Sumatra and natural dipterocarp forests of Kayan Mentarang, East Kalimantan. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
Wollenberg, E., Merino, L., Agrawal, A., & Ostrom, E. (2007). Fourteen years of monitoring community-managed forests: Learning from IFRI’s experience. International Forestry Review, 9(2), 670–684.
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage Publications.
Zikri, I. (2017). Social transformation and the change of community capacity of post-tsunami Aceh, In-donesia. Social Science & Humanities, 25(3), 1297–1318.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fadhil Ilhamsyah, Ikhwan Rahmatika Latif, Mukhrijal, Chairul Iqbal Aziz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
For all articles published in ASEAS before December 2014 and after July 2022, copyright is retained by the authors. For articles published between January 2015 and June 2022, the Society for South-East Asian Studies (SEAS) is the copyright holder. Articles published in ASEAS before December 2019 are licensed under the following Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported. Articles published after that date are licensed under the following Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International. In both cases, this means that everybody is free to share (to copy, to distribute, and to transmit the work) under the following conditions:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
