Durable Violence in Southeast Asia
Machinery and Scale
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-0018Keywords:
Southeast Asia, ViolenceAbstract
Rampant forms of violence increasingly take place not only in troubled areas but also in centers and metropoles. Such violence is no longer simply confined to local concerns or historical ruptures, but emerges instead in relation to modalities of power. The movement of people and expanding networks of actors and capital enables the notion of violence to transgress boundaries set by institutions, geography, state, and power. In some conditions, rather than sealing off the emergence of violence, the transition to democracy has opened the door for engineered violent confrontations to manifest out of cleavages that have been tempered by previous authoritarian rule. ASEAS 12(2) addresses violence in selected cases and on different scales. The contributions discuss how violence is practiced, how it (re)produces structures, and how it may eventually transform into non-violence. Violence is not simply an outcome of tensions but is a mechanism that actors and organizations deploy to stabilize their struggles, which eventually makes peacebuilding or democratic projects volatile. The articles in this issue feature police violence in the Philippines; intimate partner violence against women in Vietnam; Islamist online/offline mobilization strategies in Indonesia; the role of traditional actors in reconciliation processes in Timor-Leste; and gender security in the context of conflict management in Thailand’s Deep South.
References
Agamben, G. (2005). State of exception. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Arendt, H. (1970). On violence. New York: Harcourt Brace and Company.
Association of Southeast Asian Nations. (2016). ASEAN regional plan of action on elimination of violence against children. Retrieved from https://asean.org/?static_post=asean-regional-plan-action-elimination-violence-children-asean-rpa-evac
Böhmelt, T., Bove, V., & Gleditsch, K. S. (2019). Blame the victims? Refugees, state capacity, and non-state actor violence. Journal of Peace Research, 56(1), 73–87.
Bourdieu, P. (1992). Language, gender, and symbolic violence. In P. Bourdieu, & J. D. Wacquant (Eds.), Invi- tation to reflexive sociology (pp. 140-173). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Boyce, J.K. (1993). The political economy of growth and impoverishment in the Marcos Era. Honolulu: Univer- sity of Hawaii Press.
Chatterji, R., & Mehta, D. (2007). Living with violence: An anthropology of events and everyday life. New Delhi: Routledge.
Curato, N. (2017). Flirting with authoritarian fantasies? Rodrigo Duterte and the new terms of Philippine populism. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 47(1), 142-153.
Das, V. (2004). The signature of the state: The paradox of illegibility. In V. Das, & D. Poole (Eds.), Anthropo- logy in the margins of the state (pp. 225-52). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
della Porta, D. (2018). Radicalization: A relational perspective. Annual Review of Political Science (21), 461- 474.
della Porta, D. (1995). Social movements, political violence, and the state: A comparative analysis of Italy and Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Giddens, A. (1987). The nation-state and violence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hadiz, V.R. (2016). Islamic populism in Indonesia and the Middle East. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kerrigan, H. (2017). Historic documents of 2016. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Kreuzer, P. (2019). Police use of deadly force in the Philippines: Comparing levels and patterns before and since Duterte. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 12(2), 149-166.
Liow, J.C. (2016). Religion and nationalism in Southeast Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marddent, A. (2019). Religious discourse and gender security in southern Thailand. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 12(2), 225-247.
Mbembe, A. (2003). Necropolitics. Public Culture, 15(1), 11-40.
McCargo, D. (2014). Southern Thailand: From conflict to negotiations. Lowy Institute for International Policy. Retrieved from http://www.lowyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/mccargo_southern-thailand_0_0.pdf
McGibbon, R. (2004). Secessionist challenges in Aceh and Papua: Is special autonomy the solution? Washing- ton: East-West Center.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Economic outlook for Southeast Asia, China and India 2019. Towards smart urban transportation. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/development/asia-pacific/01_SAEO2019_Overview_WEB.pdf
Rojas-Perez, I. (2017). Mourning remains: State atrocity, exhumations, and governing the disappeared in Peru’s postwar Andes. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Rydstrom, H. (2019). Machinery of male violence: Embodied properties and chronic crisis amongst part- ners in Vietnam. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 12(2), 167-185.
Scheper-Hughes, N. (2008). Whose violence? Death in America – A California triptych. Social Anthropology, 16(1), 77-82.
Scheper-Hughes, N., & Bourgois, P. (2004). Introduction: Making sense of violence. In N. Scheper-Hughes, & P. Bourgois (Eds.), Violence in war and peace (pp.1–32). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Seto, A. (2019). Islamist buzzers: Message flooding, offline outreach, and astroturfing. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 12(2), 187-208.
Sousa, L. (2019). State appropriation of traditional actors and oral narratives in Timor-Leste. Austrian Jour- nal of South-East Asian Studies, 12(2), 209-223.
Stange, G., Sakdapolrak, P., Sasiwongsaroj, K., & Kourek, M. (2019). Forced migration in Southeast Asia – A brief overview of current research. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 12(2), 249-265.
Stange, G., & Patock, R. (2010). From Rebels to Rulers and Legislators: The Political Transformation of the Free Aceh Movement (GAM) in Indonesia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 29(1), 95–120.
Susanto, A. (2015, April 2 ). Buku teroris: awas, buku ajarkan bunuh-membunuh ini beredar ke SMA Situ- bondo. Solopos.com. Retrived from http://disq.us/t/3j0rh8n
The Asia Foundation. (2017). The state of conflict and violence in Asia. Retrieved from https://asiafoundati- on.org/publication/state-conflict-violence-asia/
Tilly, C. (2003). The politics of collective violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
True, J. (2017). Conflict in Asia and the role of gender-based violence. In The Asia Foundation (ed.), The State of Conflict and Violence in Asia (pp. 230-236). Retrieved from https://asiafoundation.org/publication/state-conflict-violence-asia/
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2018). Rohingya emergency. Retrieved from http:// www.unhcr.org/rohingya-emergency.html
van Klinken, G. (2007). Communal Violence and Democratization in Indonesia: Small town wars. Abingdon: Routledge.
Vigh, H. (2008). Crisis and chronicity: Anthropological perspectives on continuous conflict and decline. Ethnos, 73(1), 5-24.
Wilson, I. (2010). The rise and fall of political gangsters in Indonesian democracy. In E. Aspinall, & M. Mietzner (Eds.), Problems of democratization in Indonesia: Elections, institutions and society (pp. 199–218). Singapore: ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Society for South-East Asian Studies (SEAS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
For all articles published in ASEAS before December 2014 and after July 2022, copyright is retained by the authors. For articles published between January 2015 and June 2022, the Society for South-East Asian Studies (SEAS) is the copyright holder. Articles published in ASEAS before December 2019 are licensed under the following Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported. Articles published after that date are licensed under the following Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International. In both cases, this means that everybody is free to share (to copy, to distribute, and to transmit the work) under the following conditions:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
